Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shawn Harrel's avatar

Not earlier research, but an article from a few years after this and I loved it (cited in Inoue's contract-based grading book, so it may be familiar to some) -- cited below. As a K-12 teacher of over 20 years -- and, frankly, as a student -- I'm shocked to know that in 1973 someone was writing this list of teaching techniques:

1. Never call on anybody who has not volunteered.

2. Never correct an interpretation.

3. Never berate students for lack of knowledge, understanding, or hard work.

4. Never use lecture as the dominant approach.

5. Never require specific projects at specific times.

And this is an incredible teaching philosophy for ungraders:

"But I believe that in a non-judgmental, unpunitive, encouraging context, students will want to work toward achieving self-styled and often very challenging goals. While nothing in the format of the course coerces a student to do anything which reason, energetic teaching, and the student's native curiosity do not inspire, I, needless to say, constantly encourage self-discipline and self-respecting work (p. 629)."

Mandel, B. J. (1973). Teaching without judging. College English, 34(5), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.2307/375330

As a side note, I just finished very inspiring research for my dissertation on my own class and the students' experiences with ungrading

Expand full comment
Sarah Silverman's avatar

The point you shared about increased student anxiety about the unfamiliarity of the grading method is something I have encountered. I always wonder about the hypothetical situation in which ungrading is more familiar (more instructors do it, or a student has taken multiple classes with an instructor who does it) and whether that anxiety falls away, or whether it is about the cognitive load of managing both traditionally graded and "ungraded" courses at the same time? Difficult to figure out (to my mind anyway)

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts